A study to assess the effectiveness of Aromatherapy during First Stage of Labour among women in Selected Hospitals, Puducherry
Dr. V. Indra
Department of Maternal, Child and Community Health Nursing, University of Hail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
*Corresponding Author Email:indra.selvam1@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Aromatherapy is the therapeutic applications of oil originating from various parts of herbal plants. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of aromatherapy in first stage of labour with 30 experimental and 30 control groups of total 60 expectant mothers during first stage of labour. The research was a quasi experimental design after pilot study, the main study was performed with 10ml warm olive oil was back massaged for 10 min and scored the labour pain along with the socio-demographic variables were noted. There was significant difference between the labour pain level among first stage labour mothers in both experimental and control group after the application of aromatherapy to experimental group. All these indicated that aromatherapy is effective in reliving labour pain level and this procedure provide maximum comfort and satisfaction.
KEYWORDS:Aromatherapy, primigravida, labour pain level, socio-demographic variables.
INTRODUCTION:
Aromatherapy, a branch of herbology is one of the fastest growing therapies in the world today [1]. It is thought to enhance the parasympathetic response through the effect of touch, smell and encountering relaxation at a deep level. Regular aromatherapy helps to relax and relieve the discomforts like such as backache, swollen ankles during pregnancy and labour, birth and the postnatal period. The oils contain chemicals which act like drugs, some natural oils may are not suitable for pregnant mums since they may cause increase blood pressure. Essential oils may have hormone-like activity and their structure is similar enough to a hormones structure for them to interact with the same receptor. Oestrogenic activity has been found in certain plants due to their content of the chemical oestrone. Phytoestrogens are compounds that occur in plants and whilst they are not identical to human oestrogen, they are similar in structure and thereby elicit an oestrogenic response by reacting with oestrogen receptors [2].
The following essential oils have been listed by the “International Federation of Professional Aroma therapists” as being safe to use during pregnancy, in the correct low doses. Benzoin, Bergamot, Black pepper, Chamomile german, Chamomile roman. Early Stage – From 37 Weeks, Cypress, Eucalyptus, Frankincense, Ginger, Grapefruit, Geranium, Juniper, Lavender, Lemon, Mandarin, Marjoram Sweet, Neroli, Olive oil, Petitgrain, Rose Otto, Sandalwood, Sweet Orange, Patchouli, Sandalwood, Tangerine, Tea tree and Ylangylang[3].In common oils that are used in pregnancy are lavender, citrus oils (Chamomile, frankincense, grapefruit, mandarin, neroli, orange and Ylangylang). Essential oils have the power to rejuvenate the mind, body, emotions and spirit. Based on the folk and ancient practice the essential oils heal by “therapeutically” stimulating the olfactory senses, mental responses, circulatory and respiratory functions. These essences of essential oils are energizing and stimulate the release of endorphins, which may heals be less likely to use pain medication[4].Comparing to all the non pharmacological methods of pains relief during labour, back massage has many important benefits for the mother, such as it the mother as well as to the fetus. Olive oil is healthy and having more health benefits. Using aroma oils, olive oil, promote relaxations thereby reducing the labour pain perception without any side effects and any health professional could give. Hence the research was focused on a descriptive clinical study for the effectiveness of aromatherapy during first stage of labour to evaluate the effectiveness of aromatherapy on pain relief during first stage of labour among mothers in selected Hospitals, at Puducherry.
METHODOLOGY:
The descriptive clinical study was to evaluate the effectiveness of aromatherapy on pain relief during first stage of labour among mothers. The objectives are to assess the level of labour pain among mothers in experimental and control group before and after aromatherapy in relation to socio-demographic variables. The study was conducted in selected Hospitals, Puducherry with 30 experimental and 30 control groups of total 60 expectant mothers during first stage of labor in selected hospitals at Puducherry. The research was a quasi experimental design with the non- equivalent control group was selected for the study.
Inclusion Criteria:
The following were the inclusion criteria in our study, first stage labour mothers with primigravida of 4-8cm cervical dilatation, the age group in between 18-37 years, willingness to participate in the study and are able to communicate in Tamil or English. [5][6]
Exclusion Criteria:
The exclusion criteria in our study was labour mothers of multigravida, admitted in caesarean section, women in second and third stage of labour and with bad obstetric history of gynecology problems and receiving narcotics and pain medication. [5][6]
PROCEDURE:
The first stage labour mothers with primigravida were explained about the procedure, the position the mother was in left lateral position covered by the mother with bed sheet. The nursing care taker was in a hygienic process. The mothers in the control group did not use any pain reduction strategies where as in the experimental group aromatherapy. Mother was enquired about the pain index to mark the pain level. 10ml warm olive oil was back massaged for 10 min and repeats for every one hour during the active phase by placing one hand on top of the other in the small of the back and allows heat to build up under the hands and gently moved the hands in an anticlockwise circular movement with firm contact on the skin. After 10 min the pain index was noted. Data collection tools were validated and reliability was established after pilot study, the main study was collected. The collected data were analyzed and interpreted using descriptive and inferential statistics. Frequency and percentage were computed to summarize the socio demographic variables, phase wise frequency and percentage distribution of labour pain among experimental and control group after aromatherapy and variable wise mean pain. Level of expectant mothers of experimental and control group pain values were computed to find out the relationship between the level of pain and selected socio demographic variables before and after aromatherapy and the t test was computed to find out the difference in the pain levels of the mothers in experimental and control group.
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY TOOL:
The study consists of Section A and B. [7][8]
Section A: Collecting and interpreting the socio-demographic data (age, education, occupation, family income, type of family, religion and area of residence).
Section B: Assess the level of first stage labour pain with a modified visual analog scale. The modified visual analog scale comprise of 10 cm horizontal line with end points marked as “mild pain” and” worst possible pain”.
DESCRIPTION OF SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES:
In experimental group (Table 1) 36.6%of respondents were between the age group of 18-22 years old 10 % of them were between the age group of 33-37 years, 53.3 % were between the ages of 23-27 years, 10% of them were between the age group of 28-32 years in control group.
Table 1 Frequency and percentage distribution according to demographic variables
|
|
Demo graphic variables |
Experimental Group |
Control Group |
||
|
Frequency |
% |
Frequency |
% |
||
|
Age |
18-22 yrs |
11 |
36.5 |
8 |
26.7 |
|
|
23-27 yrs |
8 |
26.7 |
16 |
53.3 |
|
|
28-32 yrs |
8 |
26.7 |
3 |
10.0 |
|
33-37 yrs |
3 |
10.0 |
3 |
10.0 |
|
|
|
Illiterate |
4 |
13.3 |
0 |
0 |
|
Education status |
Primary school |
15 |
50.0 |
15 |
50.0 |
|
Secondary school |
9 |
30.0 |
10 |
33.3 |
|
|
|
Graduate |
2 |
6.7 |
5 |
16.7 |
|
Occupation |
House wife |
19 |
63.3 |
20 |
66.7 |
|
Coolie |
8 |
26.7 |
7 |
23.3 |
|
|
Priv. employee |
3 |
10.0 |
1 |
3.3 |
|
|
Govt. employee |
0 |
0 |
2 |
6.7 |
|
|
Others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Income |
< = 3000 |
10 |
33.3 |
8 |
26.7 |
|
3001 – 5000 |
11 |
36.7 |
15 |
50.0 |
|
|
5001 – 7000 |
9 |
30.0 |
7 |
23.3 |
|
|
>7000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Family type |
Nuclear |
13 |
43.3 |
18 |
60.0 |
|
Joint |
15 |
50.0 |
10 |
33.3 |
|
|
extended |
2 |
6.7 |
2 |
6.7 |
|
|
Religion |
Hindu |
13 |
43.3 |
20 |
66.7 |
|
Muslim |
7 |
56.7 |
6 |
20.0 |
|
|
Christian |
0 |
0 |
4 |
13.3 |
|
|
Others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Residence |
Rural |
17 |
56.7 |
15 |
50.0 |
|
Urban |
13 |
43.3 |
15 |
50.0 |
|
As depicted in Table 1describe the majority (50%) of them were completed primary schools and only 6.7 % had completed graduate and above in experimental group. In control 50% were completed primary school and 6.7 % have completed graduate and above. The majorities 63.3% of the first stage labour mothers were housewives and 26.7 % were coolie in experimental group in control group 66.7 % of first stage labour mothers were housewives and 3.3 % were working in private sector. In experimental group 36.7 % have RS. 3001-5000 income per month in experimental group 50 % have Rs.3.001-5000 income per month in control group. In experimental group50 % were in joint family and only 6.7 % were in extended family. In control group 60% were in nuclear family and only 6.7% were in extended family.The majority 56 % of the first stage labour mothers were Muslims in experimental group. In control group 66.7 % of responders were Hindus. In experimental groups 56.7 % of the first stage labour mothers were living in rural area and 43.3 % were living in urban area. Similarly, in control group 50 % of the first stage labour mothers were living in rural area and 50 % were living in urban area.
Table 2 Assessment of pain level of labour in pre test
|
Pain level |
Score range
|
Experimental Group |
Control group |
||
|
Frequency |
% |
Frequency |
% |
||
|
Mild pain |
2 cm |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Moderate pain |
2.1 to 4 cm |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3.3 |
|
Severe pain |
4.1 to 6 cm |
21 |
70 |
16 |
53.4 |
|
Very severe pain |
6.1 to 8 cm |
9 |
30 |
13 |
43.3 |
|
Worst pain |
8.1 to 10 cm |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
|
30 |
100 |
30 |
100 |
The mean pain scores among experimental and control group were same. The pre test mean score of pain in experimental group the minimum score was 4.4 and maximum score was 6.8 with X=5.56, S.D=0.60 as the control group the minimum score was 4.0 and maximum score was 6.8 with X=5.82, S.D=0.68 and calculated t value was 1.63. This indicates that there was no significant (P>0.01) difference of mean pain scores among experimental and control group as shown in table 2.
Table 3 Assessment of pain level of labour in post test
|
Pain level |
Score range
|
Experimental Group |
Control group |
||
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
||
|
Mild pain |
2 cm |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Moderate pain |
2.1 to 4 cm |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Severe pain |
4.1 to 6 cm |
15 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
|
Very severe pain |
6.1 to 8 cm |
15 |
50 |
1 |
3.3 |
|
Worst pain |
8.1 to 10 cm |
0 |
0 |
29 |
96.7 |
|
Total |
|
30 |
100 |
30 |
100 |
Table 4 Distribution of modified visual analog scores, mean, differences in mean and standard deviation in the first stage labour
|
Modified visual analog scale score |
Experimental Group |
Control group |
||
|
Pre test |
Post test |
Pre test |
Post test |
|
|
Minimum |
4.4 |
4.5 |
4 |
66.7 |
|
Maximum |
6.8 |
7.7 |
6.8 |
20.0 |
|
Mean |
5.56 |
6.14 |
5.82 |
13.3 |
|
Difference in mean |
0.58 |
3.15 |
||
|
Standard deviation |
0.60 |
0.79 |
0.68 |
0.42 |
Table 3 discuss the post test mean score of pain in experimental group the minimum score was 4.5 and maximum score was 7.7 with X=6.14, S.D=0.79 as the control group the minimum score was 7.9 and maximum score was 9.8 with X=9.01, S.D=0.42 and calculated t value was 17.45. This indicates that there was significant (P<0.01) difference of mean pain scores among experimental and control group. No significant association was found between all the variables selected for the study in the post test score of pain at P>0.05 level as shown in table 4.
CONCLUSION:
Labour for most women is accompanied by much physical pain and emotions requiring special care in the form of gentle touch, back massage etc. Aromatherapy in the form of back massage not only provides physical comfort but also convey the message of carrying, sympathy, love and reassurance[9][10].Essential oils may have hormone-like activity if their structure is similar enough to a hormones structure for them to interact with the same receptor. Phytoestrogens are compounds that occur in plants and whilst they are not identical to human oestrogen, they are similar in structure and thereby elicit an oestrogenic response by reacting with oestrogen receptors. The study revealed that majority of the first stage labour mothers had severe pain and only few of them had very severe pain before the application of aromatherapy. There was significant difference between the labour pain level among first stage labour mothers in both experimental and control group after the application of aromatherapy to experimental group. All these indicated that aromatherapy is effective in reliving labour pain level and this procedure provide maximum comfort and satisfaction[11].The nursing science is the discovery of new knowledge to improve nursing practice. Nursing scientist seeking to develop evidence based practices in clinical area. In conclusion good supervision and appreciation of aromatherapy application in the labour pain need to be encouraged by nurses in the hospitals and community areas.
REFERENCES:
1. Thomas DV. Aromatherapy: mythical, magical, or medicinal? Holist NursPract. 2002 Oct; 16 (5):8-16.
2. Tisserand, R., and Young, R. Essential oil safety. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone.2013.
3. Buckle, J. Clinical aromatherapy: Essential oils in practice (2nd ed.).London, England: Churchill Livingstone.2003.
4. Buckle, J. Literature review: should nursing take aromatherapy more seriously? British Journal of Nursing, 2007: 16 (2), 116-120.
5. Burns, E., Zobbi, V., Panzeri, D., Oskrochi, R., and Regalia, A. Aromatherapy in childbirth: A pilot randomized controlled trial. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007; 114, 838-844.
6. Kaviani, M., Azima, S., Alavi, N., and Tabaei, M. H. The effect of lavender aromatherapy on pain perception and intrapartum outcome in primiparous women. British Journal of Midwifery, 2014; 22, 125-128.
7. Luo, T.Z., Huang, M.L., Xia, H.A. and Zeng, Y.C. Aromatherapy for Laboring Women: A Meta- Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Open Journal of Nursing, 2014; 4, 163-168.
8. Coleman Smith, V. Aromatherapy as a comfort measure during the childbearing year. International Journal of Childbirth Education, 2012; 27, 26-30.
9. Oweis A, Abushaikha L. Jordanian pregnant women's expectations of their first childbirth experience. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2004; 10: 264–271
10. LubnaAbushaikha RN and ArwaOweisRN . Labour pain experience and intensity: A Jordanian perspective International Journal of Nursing Practice 2004; 10: 264–271.
11. Burns, E. E., Blamey, C., Ersser, S. J., Barnetson, L., and Lloyd, A. J. An investigation into the use of aromatherapy in intrapartum midwifery practice. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2000; 6(2),141-147.
Received on 03.11.2016 Modified on 05.05.2017
Accepted on 19.07.2017 © A&V Publications all right reserved
Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research.2017; 7(4): 495-498.
DOI:10.5958/2349-2996.2017.00096.9